Brzezinski
Created Al-Qaeda out of Available Mercenaries and Crazies
— He lured the Soviets into
Afghanistan —
In 1998, former Carter National Security Advisor Zbigniew
Brzezinski was interviewed by Le Nouvel
Observateur:
Question: The
former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [From The Shadows] that the American
intelligence services began to aid the Mujahiddin in Afghanistan six months
before the Soviet intervention. In this period, you were the national security
advisor to President Carter. You therefore played a key role in this affair. Is
this correct?
Brzezinski: Yes.
According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahiddin began
during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan on
December 24, 1979. But the reality, closely guarded until now, is completely
otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first
directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul.
And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him
that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
Q: Despite this
risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself
desired this Soviet entry into the war and looked for a way to provoke it?
B: It wasn’t
quite like that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly
increased the probability that they would.
Q: When the
Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight
against secret US involvement in Afghanistan, nobody believed them. However,
there was an element of truth in this. You don’t regret any of this today?
B: Regret what?
That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the
Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the
Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter,
essentially: “We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam
war." Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war that was
unsustainable for the regime, a conflict that brought about the demoralization
and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Q: And neither do
you regret having supported Islamic fundamentalism, which has given arms and
advice to future terrorists?
B: What is more
important in world history? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire?
Some agitated Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the
cold war?
Q: “Some agitated
Moslems”? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents
a world menace today...
B: Nonsense! It
is said that the West has a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid:
There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner, without
demagoguery or emotionalism. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5
billion followers. But what is there in common among fundamentalist Saudi
Arabia, moderate Morocco, militarist Pakistan, pro-Western Egypt, or secularist
Central Asia? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries...
No comments:
Post a Comment